Built for developers
who ship fast.

AI coding assistants have compressed development timelines from months to weeks. A solo developer can now ship a mobile app in days using Claude Code or Cursor. But when bugs appear — and they always do — the feedback loop breaks down.

Bug reports are written in plain language that doesn't translate well to AI tools. Screenshots miss the sequence of events. Video recordings have no structured context. The developer has to manually translate what they saw into something their AI coding tool can act on.

clip.qa closes that loop. Record a bug on your phone, and our AI generates a structured report — steps to reproduce, expected vs actual behavior, device context — formatted specifically for AI coding assistants. Paste it into Claude Code or Cursor and the AI has everything it needs to write the fix.

• 01
  Bug reporting should be one tap.

  The friction between "I see a bug" and "there's a structured report" should be seconds, not minutes.

• 02
  QA should work with your AI tools, not against them.

  If you're building with Claude Code or Cursor, your bug reports should be in a format those tools understand natively.

• 03
  No SDK should mean no SDK.

  Tools that require code changes to test your app aren't tools for testing — they're dependencies. clip.qa uses your phone's native screen recording. Nothing to install.

• 04
  Vibe QA is a real category.

  The same way vibe coding changed how software gets built, Vibe QA is changing how it gets tested. clip.qa is the first dedicated tool for this workflow.

We're a small team of developers who spent years frustrated by the gap between how fast we could build and how slow bug reporting was. clip.qa is what we wished existed.

We're based remotely and ship fast. If you have feedback, questions, or want to talk about Vibe QA, reach us at hello@clip.qa.